So yes — her math does add up to 9 and 10, but only because she selectively chose digits to fit the outcome. It’s not a neutral calculation; it’s a ritual of pattern‑finding designed to dramatize inevitability.
Me: If both dates (the two trump assassination attempts) unlocked the spiritual door, why would it be only one of the dates that she adds numbers up from to get 9/10?
Copilot: That’s a sharp observation — and it exposes the selective logic at play in Amanda Grace’s interpretation.
🔍 Why Only One Date Is Used.
Convenience of outcome: She chooses the Butler date (7/13/2024) because it can be manipulated into “9/10.” The other Trump attempt doesn’t yield the desired number, so it’s ignored.
Pattern‑finding bias: This is a form of confirmation bias — starting with the known outcome (Charlie Kirk’s death on 9/10) and working backward to find a date that can be twisted to fit.
Spectacle framing: By highlighting only the date that “works,” she creates the impression of inevitability, even though the method is inconsistent.
⚖️ What This Means.
If both assassination attempts truly “unlocked spiritual doors,” then logically both dates should matter.
But because only one date can be numerically bent into “9/10,” she elevates that one as the “prophetic” key.
This shows the ritual isn’t about consistent spiritual mechanics — it’s about selective spectacle, choosing whichever fragments can be made to look meaningful.
[end]
What Amanda Grace claims in the video you posted is bullplop. BTW, the video you posted is incomplete. Here is a more complete version. Though it looks like it is just 6 seconds longer.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteVia Copilot...
ReplyDeleteAmanda Grace’s arithmetic goes like this:
Butler date: 7/13/2024
She selects digits: 2 + 2 + 4 + 1 = 9
Then she adds 7 + 3 = 10
Result: 9/10, which she links to the date of Charlie Kirk’s death.
🔍 What’s Going On.
Selective digit use: She chooses which numbers to add (2, 2, 4, 1) and which to ignore. There’s no consistent rule — it’s tailored to produce “9.”
Confirmation bias: Because she already knows Kirk died on 9/10, she works backward to make the Butler date fit.
Spectacle logic: The arithmetic isn’t about mathematics, it’s about creating the impression of hidden inevitability.
🐉 Mythic Reading.
This is the Numerical Omen Glyph Ceremony:
Digits from Butler date → Hidden Keys.
Summation ritual → Selective Arithmetic Glyph, bending numbers until they yield the desired omen.
9/10 outcome → Prophecy Confirmation Glyph, retroactively linking Trump’s failed assassination attempt to Kirk’s death.
So yes — her math does add up to 9 and 10, but only because she selectively chose digits to fit the outcome. It’s not a neutral calculation; it’s a ritual of pattern‑finding designed to dramatize inevitability.
Me: If both dates (the two trump assassination attempts) unlocked the spiritual door, why would it be only one of the dates that she adds numbers up from to get 9/10?
Copilot: That’s a sharp observation — and it exposes the selective logic at play in Amanda Grace’s interpretation.
🔍 Why Only One Date Is Used.
Convenience of outcome: She chooses the Butler date (7/13/2024) because it can be manipulated into “9/10.” The other Trump attempt doesn’t yield the desired number, so it’s ignored.
Pattern‑finding bias: This is a form of confirmation bias — starting with the known outcome (Charlie Kirk’s death on 9/10) and working backward to find a date that can be twisted to fit.
Spectacle framing: By highlighting only the date that “works,” she creates the impression of inevitability, even though the method is inconsistent.
⚖️ What This Means.
If both assassination attempts truly “unlocked spiritual doors,” then logically both dates should matter.
But because only one date can be numerically bent into “9/10,” she elevates that one as the “prophetic” key.
This shows the ritual isn’t about consistent spiritual mechanics — it’s about selective spectacle, choosing whichever fragments can be made to look meaningful.
[end]
What Amanda Grace claims in the video you posted is bullplop. BTW, the video you posted is incomplete. Here is a more complete version. Though it looks like it is just 6 seconds longer.