🧾 Cracker Barrel Is Not Being Sued -- But It Is Under Scrutiny.
As of now, Cracker Barrel is not facing a formal lawsuit, but a conservative legal group called America First Legal (AFL) has filed a request for federal and state investigations into the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies.
AFL claims that Cracker Barrel’s internal programs -- like Business Resource Groups (BRGs) for Black, Latino, LGBTQ+, and women employees -- offer benefits that may be restricted by race or sex, which they argue could violate civil rights laws. They’ve asked the EEOC and the Tennessee Attorney General to investigate.
So while there’s no lawsuit yet, there’s a push to trigger one through regulatory channels.
🕵️ “Criminal Elements Exposed From Behind”?
That phrase likely refers to AFL’s framing of DEI policies as covertly discriminatory -- suggesting that behind the public-facing language of inclusion, there are allegedly unlawful practices. It’s rhetorical theater:
“Criminal elements” implies legal wrongdoing.
“Exposed from behind” evokes a hidden agenda being revealed.
But legally speaking, this is still in the allegation phase, not a criminal case. The phrase is more about ideological framing than legal fact.
This is just the beginning. From what I saw in 1 of the videos, that crackpot DEI hire screwed the pooch. The new look inside is ugly. The old look had a mom and pop restaurant look, and was quite nice and cozy.
🧾 Cracker Barrel Is Not Being Sued -- But It Is Under Scrutiny.
ReplyDeleteAs of now, Cracker Barrel is not facing a formal lawsuit, but a conservative legal group called America First Legal (AFL) has filed a request for federal and state investigations into the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies.
AFL claims that Cracker Barrel’s internal programs -- like Business Resource Groups (BRGs) for Black, Latino, LGBTQ+, and women employees -- offer benefits that may be restricted by race or sex, which they argue could violate civil rights laws. They’ve asked the EEOC and the Tennessee Attorney General to investigate.
So while there’s no lawsuit yet, there’s a push to trigger one through regulatory channels.
🕵️ “Criminal Elements Exposed From Behind”?
That phrase likely refers to AFL’s framing of DEI policies as covertly discriminatory -- suggesting that behind the public-facing language of inclusion, there are allegedly unlawful practices. It’s rhetorical theater:
“Criminal elements” implies legal wrongdoing.
“Exposed from behind” evokes a hidden agenda being revealed.
But legally speaking, this is still in the allegation phase, not a criminal case. The phrase is more about ideological framing than legal fact.
(Via Copilot)
Your fart robot said that, Dervish?😆😆😆😆😆
DeleteThis is just the beginning. From what I saw in 1 of the videos, that crackpot DEI hire screwed the pooch. The new look inside is ugly. The old look had a mom and pop restaurant look, and was quite nice and cozy.
DeleteI have no idea if "the new look inside is ugly". I have never been to a cracker barrel and very likely will never go to a cracker barrel.
DeleteI don't have a "fart robot". I queried Copilot, which is a chatbot, not a "fart robot".