Officials Refuse To Release Angela Chao's Death Record

https://www.statesman.com/story/news/state/2024/02/21/angela-chao-death-austin-fatal-crash-blanco-county-texas-authorities-records-not-released/72675958007/

Ancient family secret buried, perhaps?

posted from Bloggeroid

Frisco Appoints Non Citizen Chinese Woman To Election Board

https://nypost.com/2024/02/21/us-news/non-citizen-chinese-immigrant-is-sworn-in-on-sfs-election-commission/amp/

Kelly Wong, an immigration rights activist who came to the US in 2019 from Hong Kong for graduate studies, was unanimously appointed by San Francisco's Board of Supervisors to the city's Elections Commission on Feb. 14...

https://nypost.com/2024/02/21/us-news/non-citizen-chinese-immigrant-is-sworn-in-on-sfs-election-commission

posted from Bloggeroid

Why In-N-Out Will Not Open On The East Coast

https://www.tasteofhome.com/article/why-in-n-out-wont-open-on-the-east-coast/?utm_content=toh&utm_medium=organicsocial&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR1VBGaUzusfNH64lU5lO2aOY-Ds4Muz-l3bD8oTT5uDdVsijCfIVQXeSuM

Hang on United States of  America!  SUPER BIG  AND JUICY  Deliciousness awaits you, if you pray for California to kick out the demonic forces attacking the government.  The Democrats and RINOs must go.

posted from Bloggeroid

Eighth Amendment

The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” This amendment prohibits the federal government from imposing unduly harsh penalties on criminal defendants, either as the price for obtaining ...

The Eighth Amendment prohibits certain types of punishment: excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishments.1 As discussed in more detail in the following essays, these prohibitions were intended to protect persons convicted of crimes from government abuses of power.

2 Viewed broadly, the Eighth Amendment responded to these historically grounded concerns about disproportionate or cruel punishments by attempting to ensure that punishment is proportioned to both the offender and the offense.

3 What is excessive is also determined by reference to modern standards; the Supreme Court has suggested proportionality may evolve over time.

4 Out of the Eighth Amendment’s three clauses, the bar on cruel and unusual punishment has been most frequently interpreted by the Supreme Court, likely in part due to inherent ambiguities in determining what qualifies as cruel or unusual.

5 The Eighth Amendment generally applies in criminal proceedings, as the most common locus of government punishment, but the Supreme Court has held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines can apply in civil forfeiture proceedings, noting that the text of the amendment is not limited to criminal cases.

6 Instead, the Court said the relevant constitutional test is whether the government is imposing punishment, focusing on the purpose of a sanction.

7 In addition, although the Eighth Amendment (like the rest of the Bill of Rights) was understood originally to apply only to the federal government, the Supreme Court has held its prohibitions were incorporated in the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, making them applicable to states.

The protection against double jeopardy keeps defendants from facing criminal prosecution more than once for the same offense. Once jeopardy attaches and a criminal case begins, this protection can prevent lives from being consumed by legal proceedings.

Under double jeopardy, a person cannot: Be prosecuted for the same crime after being found not guilty in a simple legal jurisdiction; or. Be prosecuted for the same crime again after being convicted in a single legal jurisdiction; or. Be punished for the same crime more than once in a single legal jurisdiction.

What 2 qualities must evidence have to be admissible in court?

Generally, to be admissible, the evidence must be relevant) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or, among other reasons, based on hearsay).

Under double jeopardy, a person cannot: Be prosecuted for the same crime after being found not guilty in a simple legal jurisdiction; or. Be prosecuted for the same crime again after being convicted in a single legal jurisdiction; or. Be punished for the same crime more than once in a single legal jurisdiction.

Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court and Federal circuit courts of appeals have held that defendants who have not fully satisfied their sentences may be retried without violating the double jeopardy clause.

What is an example of when double jeopardy does not apply?

But double jeopardy in California doesn't apply to all situations.

Fani Farts...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fani-willis-knows-when-a-trial-is-a-show-trial-2024-presidential-election-trump-8937c641

Fani just screwed Nathan Wade in more than one way.  Everything said from now on is tainted.  Nathan Wade looks like he got caught sticking his hand in the cookie jar.

posted from Bloggeroid

Fani's Flinging...

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/trump-prosecutor-fani-willis-admits-relationship-with-deputy-but-denies-any-wrongdoing-ad901959

posted from Bloggeroid

"I'm not gonna emasculate a Black Man!" "Whatcha talkin' 'bout, Willis?" LIAR LIAR

"I'm not gonna emasculate a Black Man!"

 "Whatcha talkin' 'bout, Willis?"  LIAR LIAR Dress On Fire!😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13094257/amp/Fani-Willis-witness-accused-sexually-assault-judge-wonder.html&ved=2ahUKEwiwmayu4LKEAxVWI0QIHYCqAGMQFnoECDIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3LCQLeU3UV7waXTPPwQR6L

posted from Bloggeroid

Missing binder at center of new claim that CIA drummed up spy operation on Trump’s 2016 campaign

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/feb/14/missing-binder-at-center-of-new-claim-that-cia-dru/

posted from Bloggeroid

CIA Spied On Donald John Trump In 2015

https://nypost.com/2024/02/13/news/cia-and-foreign-intelligence-agencies-illegally-targeted-26-trump-associates-before-2016-russia-collusion-claims-report/

posted from Bloggeroid

Is Biden Next?

republicans aim take second swing mayorkas impeachment 

Will Joey The Talking Chicken Bidet be next?

Is Nippon Steel's Purchase Of US Steel A Blessing In Disguise?

 

There has been chatter on live streams, with people whining about Nippon Steel's Purchase of US STEEL.  When you look at all the different products above made out of American steel, we are blessed that US Steel wasn't purchased by a Chinese or Indian steel company.

Here's a list of Chinese steel companies that could have bought US Steel :

Liuzhou Steel, Angang Steel Company, Hunan Valin Steel, Beiman Special Steel, Baowu, Chongqing Iron And Steel Company, Tata Steel, Bao Steel Group, China Metal Recycling, Delong Steel Limited, Wuyang steel, HBIS Group, Arcelor Mittal  and JFE Steel.

Any of these Chinese companies could spell trouble because they are under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).  Nippon Steel is not part of the CCP.  NIPPON STEEL is a Japanese company, not a Chinese Communist Party company. 

Take a good look at all the pictures ABOVE... notice that they are items mostly made in the USA.  The Nash and Hudson Metropolitan is an imported car made by Austin Motors in the UK, made for AMC to sell alongside the Nash and Hudsons back in the 1950s, and sold alongside Rambler from 1958-62.  US Steel was a big supplier of steel to AMC, Ford, GM, Chrysler and independent companies.

Schwinn bikes and other American bike makers relied on US Steel for their metal to make their bikes and parts.

US Steel may have struggled recently, but Nippon Steel is #4 of the top 10 steel makers in the world.  None of these 13 Chinese steel companies made it into the top 10.  The positive thing is this:  US Steel is not part of the Communist Chinese Party's steel industry.